Wednesday, May 13, 2009
Pix
This is a visualization of the frequency subjects were mentioned in the New York Times in 2003 and their relationships to other stories by blprnt_van at Flickr. An amazing visualization. See them all here. Its worth the effort to see the detail, how they change year to year and his other visualizations. I love the idea of making art from data.
Friday, May 8, 2009
Pakistan
This is a happening map, if I do say so myself. Via Google Maps mashups, you can see not only the borders and main cities of Pakistan, but also the population density and, outlined in blue, the Pashtun areas.The Americans seem to have gone nutty about Pakistan in the last few weeks. The New York Times, in particular, has been fear mongering like its 2003 again. There have been articles as full of paranoia, guilt by association, speculation and unrealistic worst case scenarios as anything they printed in the run-up to Iraq. This article is a good example. Here is another.
The first thing is that the Taliban are an expression of Pashtun nationalism. They have no traction whatsoever outside Pashtun areas. Where they do have a presence, like Karachi, its based on the city`s Pashtun community. They operate there like a crime gang, not an ideological force. Even if most Pakistanis wanted an Islamist government, they wouldn't stand for one run by the Taliban. Punjabis are not going to be ruled by Pashtun. Despite the Times' assertions, there is no public evidence of a connection between the Taliban and other creatures of the ISI like Lashkar-e-Taiba. The only things they appear to have in common are radical interpretations of Islam, a love of violence and their paymaster. In addition, the city that the Times identifies as an outpost of the Taliban in Punjab is Dera Ghazi Khan. A look at the map above shows this city is on the border of Pashtun territory. It would be more surprising if they didn't have a presence there. Tell me when they are taking over Lahore.
Second is that the Times details some pretty tenuous associations to say that Punjabi groups are linked to Al-Qaida. They insinuate that elements of the Pakistani government share these links. The last operation unambiguously carried out by Al-Qaida was 9/11. They are more of a bogyman than a real threat these days. The survivors would all be dead if it weren't for the Pashtun code (see Pashtunwalli). This is the kind of thing you'd expect The New York Times to know about.
Forth, the Taliban are not going to take over Pakistan. They do not have the capability. Besides the ethnic issues noted above, there is the Pakistani Army. They are a well trained and well armed conventional military. The Army may not have much enthusiasm fighting the Pashtun in the tribal areas, but would feel a lot different if the Taliban came out of the mountains and tried to take Punjabi cities by force. That`s not their only problem, India, Iran, China and Russia would be very unhappy with a Taliban takeover and might intervene to prevent it.
Last, there's much crazy talk by the Times and many others about terrorists getting their hands on some or all of Pakistan's nuclear weapons. The Taliban have no more chance of getting Pakistani nukes than I do. The Americans seem to have forgotten everything from the Cold War. One of the key things is that the most dangerous nuclear weapons are you own. Anyone with a credible second strike capability doesn't need to worry about being attacked. The worst thing that can happen is one of your own people sets one off either locally or against another country. That was the main story in Doctor Strangelove. No matter what their religious or ideological leanings, the Pakistani Armed Forces are going to retain 100% control over those weapons at all time. The Pakistani Air Force has especially close relations with the US on nuclear weapons control. Believe it, even if the Taliban were able to take over Pakistan, the last thing they`d want is to lose control of the nukes. That would be, at the least, a career limiting move.
What this looks like is a preparation by the Americans to move into the Pakistani border areas. This would be an effective military move, but fraught with so much political downside that it would seem to be impossible. Don`t think for even a second that countries like Qatar (home of the US 7th fleet), Saudi Arabia and even Iraq would support a US invasion of another Muslim country. The only ones who would cheer would be Iran and India. In all, this looks like a worse idea than invading Iraq, and that was one of the worst ideas a US President ever had.
Sunday, May 3, 2009
WW2
This is almost the exact moment when Japan lost WW2. After the conquest of the Phillipines and the Maylay barrier, Japan won no significant battles. The Japanese thought the Americans were unskilled at war and unwilling to fight, that one hammer blow would be sufficient to knock America out of the war. They were wrong.
Both Japan and Germany had no real chance of beating their respective opponents. The Germans may have had a tiny window in Aug-Sept 1941, but the Japanese never had a chance. On December 7, 1941, the US Navy had 4 aircraft carriers in the Pacific. By September 1945, they had 150. End of story.
Here's a spectacular photo from a Japanese plane during the attack. This photo was taken 2 - 3 minutes before the one above. The attack started just before 8 am and is well underway here. The Arizona exploded at 8:06 and hasn't been hit by the fatal bomb yet.
Lots more great photos of the battle here (scroll down).
Both Japan and Germany had no real chance of beating their respective opponents. The Germans may have had a tiny window in Aug-Sept 1941, but the Japanese never had a chance. On December 7, 1941, the US Navy had 4 aircraft carriers in the Pacific. By September 1945, they had 150. End of story.
Here's a spectacular photo from a Japanese plane during the attack. This photo was taken 2 - 3 minutes before the one above. The attack started just before 8 am and is well underway here. The Arizona exploded at 8:06 and hasn't been hit by the fatal bomb yet.
Lots more great photos of the battle here (scroll down).
Thursday, April 30, 2009
Pix
Advice for the wise. Given the swine flu, you may want to do 45 seconds.
via the always great Toffuti Break
via the always great Toffuti Break
Sunday, April 26, 2009
Friday, April 24, 2009
WW2
Hitler's moment of greatest triumph, July 6, 1940. France has surrendered and Hitler has achieved in less than two months what Germany could not accomplish in the 4 years of WW1. In this photo he is basking in the total adoration of an entire nation. Had he stopped there, he would have been considered one of Germany's greatest leaders. But as Ian Kershaw observed, he couldn't stop there. Hitler was a gambler and he would continue making bigger and bigger bets until he lost.
Here is Harry Truman passing the same spot in May 1945. Truman is in the dark suit, Byrnes and Leahy are riding with him. There's a big version at the Truman library here. The gaggle suggests they stopped here for the photo.
Thursday, April 23, 2009
Wednesday, April 22, 2009
Pix
This is floating around the Internets. I have no idea where it comes from. But its a fine bit of photoshopping. This kind of thing is way harder than it looks.
Payback
The other juicy scandal in the US concerns a Congresswoman, Jane Harmon (D-Dumbass). She was caught in a legal FBI wiretap making a deal to try and get charges against two Israeli spys dismissed in exchange for lobbyist support for her political ambitions. But she wasn't charged. Instead, the Alberto Gonzales blackmailed her to support warantless wiretapping. Nice.
Anyway, Glenn Greenwald (who is usually too over the top for my taste) evicerates Harmon with her own words. He's not very nice, but it is certainly satisfying.
Anyway, Glenn Greenwald (who is usually too over the top for my taste) evicerates Harmon with her own words. He's not very nice, but it is certainly satisfying.
Magic
There's a really interesting article at Wired about magic. It turns out that magic takes advantage of limitations in the ways our brains work. As Penn and Teller have discovered, even if you know what they are doing, you are still fooled.
If the article piques your interest, check out Teller's great shadow trick here.
And this demonstrates that even if they explain what they're doing, you are still fooled.
Sunday, April 19, 2009
WW2
STG44
The Sturmgewehr 44 was a relatively cheap and powerful infantry automatic weapon. It vastly increased the soldier's volume of fire. This was the first true assault rifle and the model for all subsequent infantry weapons. The AK-47, in particular, was inspired by the STG-44, though it AK had many innovations. Nevertheless, the STG was the model and every infantry weapon since 1944 has used the concepts it pioneered.
The Sturmgewehr 44 was a relatively cheap and powerful infantry automatic weapon. It vastly increased the soldier's volume of fire. This was the first true assault rifle and the model for all subsequent infantry weapons. The AK-47, in particular, was inspired by the STG-44, though it AK had many innovations. Nevertheless, the STG was the model and every infantry weapon since 1944 has used the concepts it pioneered.
Tuesday, April 14, 2009
Correlation & Causation
Correlation does not imply causation. Look at that R squared in the top right corner. Traffic deaths and lemon imports are almost perfectly correlated. But neither causes the other. This is a really common cognitive error, nobody is immune to it. Humans like stories and patterns, they instinctively attribute relationships and process where none necessarily exist. It is hard for us to accept that many things are random and unrelated.
Monday, April 13, 2009
Dead Cat Bounce
Dow, last 12 months
The markets are up and Obama is talking about glimmers of hope. Had the situation turned? Is the crisis abating? Nope. its a dead cat bounce. Even a dead cat bounces if dropped from sufficient high.
Although specific causes like the US sub-prime mortgage market were recognized before hand, almost nobody foresaw the tremendous complexity and global nature of the coming crisis. Even they didn't see many significant consequences. The crisis so-far has had several important themes.
So the fundamental problem is too much debt. This is not just a US problem, because of globalization, everyone is involved. The solution to the crisis is for asset prices to return to sustainable values, for all the bad debt created by the asset bubble to be wound down and for new mechanisms for financing debt. Asset prices have spectacularly re-adjusted over the last year, so that's already underway. What has not happened at all is the resolution of all the bad debt or the restructuring of the debt mechanisms. Hundreds of banks around the world are sitting on piles of worthless debt. They are like a person on life-support. The body functions, but they are not viable. Thus the financial crisis persists. Obama and the rest of the G20 are frantically engineering a soft landing. No matter what, winding up all the bad debt will take years, with lots more pain on the way. Likewise, the re-invention of debt mechanisms will take years.
The currency impact of so much government debt has yet to become apparent. Europe's restructuring of its banking system to be less vulnerable has not yet begun. The decision of China and India to re-orient resources on building their domestic markets has yet to be felt in global markets. So I'm calling recent news a dead cat bounce rather than a recovery.
The markets are up and Obama is talking about glimmers of hope. Had the situation turned? Is the crisis abating? Nope. its a dead cat bounce. Even a dead cat bounces if dropped from sufficient high.
Although specific causes like the US sub-prime mortgage market were recognized before hand, almost nobody foresaw the tremendous complexity and global nature of the coming crisis. Even they didn't see many significant consequences. The crisis so-far has had several important themes.
- The US housing bubble. Asset bubbles always burst, leaving those who borrowed against bubble prices in a ruinous position.
- The tremendous over leveraging by countries like Iceland, Ireland and The Ukraine. This one is significant because it shook up the currency markets.
- The uncontrolled growth of European banks. Iceland, Ireland, Switzerland, The Netherlands, France and UK have banks who's combined liabilities greater than GDP. Iceland would have to spend all its tax dollars for the next 19 years to pay off the commitments of its failed banks.
- The stunning over borrowing by consumers in many key economies, especially the US. This over-borrowing, combined with housing deflation, means a consumer-led recovery is not on.
- Blatantly illegal activities by US banks. These people should be charged under organized crime laws rather than bailed out. Its also worth mentioning the fraud by US ratings agencies like Moody's.
- The Bush administration's spectacular corruption. This may have been the most corrupt US administration of all time. They pissed away trillions enriching themselves and their friends. Regulation first became a joke, then a memory.
- The US' move away from traditional debt instruments that everyone understood, to derivatives that nobody understood. Important because the traditional instruments have withered. Reconstituting them will take years and imply an economy with far less available debt (i.e. less growth).
- The unexpectedly global reaction to the crisis. Nobody expected such swift or far-reaching consequences in so many different places.
- The complexity of the debt instruments at the core of the crisis. Its almost impossible to take them apart to determine the status of the individual loans. Take a lemon, a lime and an orange. Put them in a blender for 1 minute on high. Now reconstitute the three original pieces of fruit.
So the fundamental problem is too much debt. This is not just a US problem, because of globalization, everyone is involved. The solution to the crisis is for asset prices to return to sustainable values, for all the bad debt created by the asset bubble to be wound down and for new mechanisms for financing debt. Asset prices have spectacularly re-adjusted over the last year, so that's already underway. What has not happened at all is the resolution of all the bad debt or the restructuring of the debt mechanisms. Hundreds of banks around the world are sitting on piles of worthless debt. They are like a person on life-support. The body functions, but they are not viable. Thus the financial crisis persists. Obama and the rest of the G20 are frantically engineering a soft landing. No matter what, winding up all the bad debt will take years, with lots more pain on the way. Likewise, the re-invention of debt mechanisms will take years.
The currency impact of so much government debt has yet to become apparent. Europe's restructuring of its banking system to be less vulnerable has not yet begun. The decision of China and India to re-orient resources on building their domestic markets has yet to be felt in global markets. So I'm calling recent news a dead cat bounce rather than a recovery.
Wednesday, April 1, 2009
The Penny Drops
I'm usually swift on the uptake, if nowhere else. But its only in the last few days that it occurred to me what Obama is taking about when he says "get the credit flowing again". On the face of it, banks have not stopped lending. If that were the case, few cars or houses would be sold in the US, and a large percentage of businesses would have gone out of business. An apocalypse, in other words. Things are bad, but so-far, not apocalyptic.
The general problem for US banks has been that they have massive amounts of Collateralized Debt Obligations* (CDOs) on their books which have little or no value. These represent unrealized losses. Nobody knows what they are worth, if anything. When the banks have to finally account for these "assets" some of the big ones will go broke. Additionally, interbank lending is said to be down substantially. This cannot be true in the traditional sense, or the whole system would have frozen up. This was a real possibility in October, but less so now. So what's Obama talking about? New CDOs.
Over the last 10 years, CDOs became the vehicle for financing all kinds of US consumer loans, most prominently mortgages. But CDOs came to include credit card debt, student loans, car loans and all kinds of other consumer lending. These loans were sliced and diced with magic tricks that turned them into virtually risk-free investments for mutual funds, hedge funds, retirement funds, schools and municipalities. The process became a money machine for everyone involved, including the consumers that took out the loans. Obviously, the magic tricks turned out to be imaginary, and the slicing and dicing has only served to make the CDOs completely opaque. Take a slice of any CDO floated by anyone in the last five years. What's it worth? Nobody knows. More importantly, nobody can know because their structure is too byzantine for anyone to figure out. It will be sorted out eventually, but that could take years.
In the meantime, nobody wants to buy any new CDOs. The mighty CDO market that brought unlimited debt to US consumers has almost completely shut down. That's what Obama means when he talks about freeing up the credit markets. He's trying to put Humpty Dumpty back together. It probably won't work, but not positively. So there is a clever political calculation involved. As a new President, his choice is to tell Americans that they need to give up the growth and prosperity they enjoyed in the last 20 years, or he can try to restore the status quo. In a general sense, he can't be blamed for trying as long as he doesn't make a mess of it. He could, however, be blamed for not trying. Americans won't accept a new, lower, standard of living unless they believe there is no choice. The political problem is potentially larger than the economic problem, but its not on the mass media radar yet, so nobody's talking about it. But Obama's thinking about it. I like that. It means that even if he is unsuccessful at getting the parade rolling again, he may retain enough political capital for plan B, whatever that turns out to be.
Incidentally, this thesis explains the Europeans' disagreement with the US over how to handle bad assets. Their banks are in the same shape, but most European economies don't depend on easy consumer credit like the US. Those who did, like Ireland, Greece and Hungary, are in deep trouble. Those that didn't, like Germany, don't see the point of spending trillions to resuscitate a discredited system they don't depend on.
*There's a great 11 minute film that explains CDOs, previously posted here.
Tuesday, March 31, 2009
Friday, March 27, 2009
The Republican "Budget"
I don't like to spend too much time on American politics as we have our own here. But somethings just resonate beyond the American context. Slightly stung by Obama's sweeping, ambitious budget, the Republicans have released their own alternative budget. 18 pages. It includes the gem below:
Their explanation of the chart:
"Republicans will be on the side of quality versus mediocrity, affordability versus unsustainable debt, and freedom of care versus bureaucrats in control. And we will be on the side of patients, doctors, and the American people."
I didn't believe this could be real, so I checked. It is. Let's just remember that the chart summarizes a very complex a multi-trillion dollar nest of policy problems. But it looks hilariously like the old Internet meme:
1. Give product away for free
2. ????
3. Profit!!!
Its rare to see such stunning political incompetence from professional politicians. Some teenagers doing a high-school project could have done better. If anyone was wondering is the the decline of the GOP is a liberal media invention or really happening, here is your answer.
Via Fark - Caution, this link leads to FARK
Their explanation of the chart:
"Republicans will be on the side of quality versus mediocrity, affordability versus unsustainable debt, and freedom of care versus bureaucrats in control. And we will be on the side of patients, doctors, and the American people."
I didn't believe this could be real, so I checked. It is. Let's just remember that the chart summarizes a very complex a multi-trillion dollar nest of policy problems. But it looks hilariously like the old Internet meme:
1. Give product away for free
2. ????
3. Profit!!!
Its rare to see such stunning political incompetence from professional politicians. Some teenagers doing a high-school project could have done better. If anyone was wondering is the the decline of the GOP is a liberal media invention or really happening, here is your answer.
Via Fark - Caution, this link leads to FARK
Sunday, March 15, 2009
Thursday, March 12, 2009
Friday, March 6, 2009
My Pix
401 looking East from Don Mills, Toronto, 1987
I remember schlepping out to this spot on the bus. It was before I had a car.
In the meantime, the streetlights and the cars have changed a lot.
Fun Facts To Know And Share
According to the Chicago Tribune, the median price of houses sold in Detroit in December was US$7500.
Thursday, March 5, 2009
World Airline Map
IMPORTANT NOTE: This image has a Wikipedia license. That means you can use it or abuse it in any way you want. You do not need my permission. For corporate customers, that applies to you too. However, some corporate customers have wanted specific licensing, and for a small fee I am happy to oblige.
Oct 31, 2012
--------------------
Here, at long last, is the world airline map. Click for big, for enormous, go here.
Things I learned from doing this map:
Oct 31, 2012
--------------------
Here, at long last, is the world airline map. Click for big, for enormous, go here.
Things I learned from doing this map:
- Every country in the world, no matter how small or poor, has at least one airline
- Some of these airlines, particularly in Africa, seem to have only one or two planes, often 2nd or 3rd hand 737s.
- Any country with a plane big enough has a flight to New York and either their former colonial master or London.
- If they have a 2nd flight to the US, it is usually to Washington, sometimes LA.
- There are more airlines in Europe than anywhere else on earth.
- Each European country has a national flag carrier, sometimes a second large airline and two to five budget airlines.
- The big airlines fly to every 1st, 2nd and 3rd tier city in Europe, the budget airlines fly to the same, plus many smaller centers, also to holiday destinations.
- The most popular European holiday destinations are the Canaries, followed by Spain, Portugal and the Caribbean.
- North Americans holiday in Hawaii, Mexico and the Caribbean.
- Asians don’t seem to have a lot of specialized holiday destinations, probably because its either warm all the time, or people don’t have enough disposable income.
- The few obvious Asian holiday destinations seem to be The Philippines, Okinawa, Thailand, Guam and Bali.
- The density of air traffic in Europe far outstrips the US or Japan.
- Highest density of flight to population is probably Australia.
- Every Muslim country has a direct flight to Jeddah, and many to Riyadh.
- Arab airlines are huge. Not just from the Gulf, but North Africa, Jordan, Lebanon and Saudi Arabia.
- Some small countries stand out due to their long-haul business. The Netherlands, Dubai, Kuwait, Abu Dhabi, Belgium, Singapore and Korea, for example.
- Some other small countries have built a good long haul business based on being holiday destinations, Fiji, The Seychelles, Mauritius, Tahiti and The Maldives.
- Countries with a surprising volume of air traffic given economic or political problems: Ethiopia, Egypt, Sri Lanka, Central Asia, Russia, Mali, Togo, Senegal, Ghana, Ecuador, Angola, Bangladesh, Madagascar.
- The most underserved countries for their populations: Iraq, DR Congo, Zimbabwe, Burma, Nepal, Peru.
- Of these, Iraq is close to a black hole. You can only fly to Baghdad from Amman, Tehran, and Kuwait.
- You can fly to almost any city in Turkey from almost any city in Germany.
- By far the densest long-haul corridor is the North Atlantic, traffic there dwarfs Europe>>Far East or Far East>> North America.
- 80% of the International traffic to and from Central and South America is going to the US, primarily Miami, New York, Dallas, Houston and LA.
- South African Airlines dominates the African airspace, South Africa is also the only African country to have discount airlines.
- Surprisingly big hubs (at least to me): Santiago, Moscow, Kuwait, Houston, Bogotá, San Juan PR, Salt Lake City, Honolulu, Bali, Guangzhou, Cairo, Tashkent, Almay, Istanbul.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




















